How we publish
Editorial policy
EarthSun separates fact, interpretation and speculation, requires every automated release to pass public quality gates and corrects the record when warranted.
Evidence standards
Factual claims should rely on primary research, recognised scientific institutions, academies, universities or government science agencies. A source supports a specific claim; it does not endorse EarthSun.
Validated automation
Automated assistance may research and prepare one weekly essay, explainer or substantial guide. Publication is allowed only when source integrity, originality, respectful language, claim boundaries, metadata, accessibility, build and public-route checks all pass. Any uncertainty, cultural sensitivity, failed check or deployment problem leaves the work unpublished.
No content farms
EarthSun does not create keyword, city, belief or query permutations. A microsite must be an independently useful guide with original structure, sufficient sources and meaningful internal links—not a doorway page.
Corrections
Readers can identify a factual error, challenge an interpretation or suggest a stronger source. Material corrections receive a visible revision date and entry in the public change log.
Fact, philosophy and speculation
Articles mark the status of their important claims. Where evidence is insufficient, the honest editorial answer is that EarthSun has no settled position.